| Chapter
12
Principles
to Grow By
Many churches are built around the personality
of the pastor and as a result the work cannot be duplicated
and the concepts are not transferable. Trying to imitate another
person's personality is never successful. God has made us
all unique individuals and His Spirit anoints us according
to our own individual characteristics.
Many times a pastor who is anxious to see church growth makes
the mistake of going to large, successful churches, looking
at their programs, and watching the way the minister relates
to his people. Then the pastor tries to copy the program and
the personality. And it just doesn't work.
It is true that God does work through personalities. They
play a very important part in the way we relate to people.
But because Calvary Chapel has been built on principles
rather than personalities, the principles are transferable
and work in all varieties of personalities. Through following
these simple steps Calvary Chapel pastors have found tremendously
successful ministries. Let me share them with you.
When I first began in the ministry I served in a denomination
whose main emphasis was evangelism. This was reflected by
the fact that the first bit of information required on my
monthly report was the number of people saved. The next box
was for the number of people baptized. I had heard so often
that the primary purpose of the Church was the evangelization
of the world, thus every sermon that I preached was somehow
brought around to evangelism and the appeal made for people
to accept Jesus Christ as their Lord and Savior.
My greatest frustration would come when I would prepare what
I felt to be a powerful evangelistic sermon that would surely
convert the most hardened sinner. And when I would arrive
at church to my dismay there was not a single sinner in the
whole congregation.
As I would sit on the platform looking over the congregation,
I knew them all by first name, so I knew there wasn't a sinner
in the house. During the song service I'd pray that God would
somehow send sinners in and when my prayers were not answered
I had to preach my evangelistic sermon to the saints. There
was no hope of conversions. As a general rule I would add
a few points in which I would castigate those in the congregation
for their failures to be the kind of witnesses that the Lord
wanted them to be. I told them if they were serving the Lord
and were doing what God wanted them to do they would have
brought some of their neighbors along to hear the Word of
God and to be saved. I would begin to beat the sheep because
they were not effectively reproducing or witnessing for Jesus
Christ.
My heart aches when I think of those early days of my ministry,
how I was creating guilt-ridden, frustrated believers. They
were guilt-ridden because what I was saying was correct. They
weren't being the kind of witnesses that they should be for
Christ. Their lives weren't measuring up to biblical standards.
They were frustrated because they desired to live victorious
lives, but they just didn't know how because their pastor
was emphasizing evangelism rather than feeding the Body
of Christ. [Emphasis mine throughout.]
[I.] This was the first lesson. Traditionally I felt
that the primary purpose of the Church was the evangelization
of the world. But biblically, Paul in Ephesians 4 tells
us that the primary purpose of the Church is to build up the
Body of Christ to perfect the saints for the work of the ministry.
The church exists to bring people into a maturity and
a unity of the faith so that they would no longer be as babes
but might fully develop in Christ Jesus. With my constant
emphasis on the repentance from dead works and the doctrines
of baptism, I had failed to bring the people into a fully
matured relationship with the Lord and they stayed in a state
of spiritual infancy.
[II.] My messages were topical, taken from Scriptures throughout
the Bible. There was no consistent pattern in my preaching.
One week my text might be from Matthew, the next week from
Isaiah, the following week from Revelation, and the following
from Genesis. I would share whatever topic happened to interest
me that week or whatever Scripture might have just spoken
to me. The most difficult part of the ministry at that time
was finding a text from which to preach. I would find myself
reading a book of the Bible until some Scripture sort of stood
out in my mind and then I would develop from that text my
message. I found that I had about two years of good topical
sermons before I ran out of ideas and so my first few pastorates
were two years' duration. After I had exhausted my two years'
of texts, I would seek a transfer to another church. This
continued until we lived in Huntington Beach. We were coming
close to the end of our two years and it was time to move
again, but a problem had developed. We had fallen in love
with Huntington Beach! We enjoyed living there and our little
girl had now started school. We did not want to leave.
Suddenly I was under pressure to find more texts and more
sermons. About this time I was reading the book The Apostle
John by Griffith Thomas. In one of the chapters he had
outlined studies on 1 John. As I studied those outlines I
found that they were excellent sermon material and there were
approximately forty of them. I decided that if I taught through
the book of 1 John on Sunday mornings, we could spend another
year in this community that we had come to love. I bought
several commentaries on 1 John and began an exhaustive study
of the epistle. I expanded on the outline studies of Griffith
Thomas and we spent a year on 1 John.
The interesting thing is that during this year our church
experienced greater growth than we had ever seen before. We
also had more conversions and more baptisms than we had ever
experienced in the past. The people were suddenly filled with
joy in their walk with Christ, they were experiencing greater
power over sin, and they had a greater assurance of their
salvation. Of course, these are the three reasons why John
wrote the epistle and we are told that God's Word will not
return void but will accomplish the purpose for which it was
sent. Inasmuch as this epistle was sent to bring the believers
into the fullness of joy, freedom from sin, and assurance
of their salvation, God's Word did its work within their lives.
And so I learned the second lesson. Expositional teaching
is stronger than topical teaching for feeding the flock. [i.e
connective expository sermons!!!]
At the end of the year we still did not want to leave Huntington
Beach. Having developed the style of teaching straight through
a book, I decided to take the book of Romans next, which
a seminary professor had told us would transform any church.
I bought as many commentaries as I could find on the book
of Romans, and spent two years teaching on it. During this
time the church DOUBLED. The work of the Holy Spirit
in the hearts of the people was electrifying as they and I
personally discovered the grace of God and began to relate
to God in a new way. It was about this time that I purchased
a new Halley's Bible Handbook. (I was always giving mine away
to new converts.)
On the flyleaf I saw a notation that said the most important
page in the book was page 814. So I turned to that page to
find out what Mr. Halley felt was the most important thing.
There was the simple suggestion that every church have a congregational
plan of Bible reading, and that the pastor's sermon be from
the part of the Bible read the past week. I had never taken
the people through the whole Bible. As a matter of fact I
had never sat down to read the whole Bible straight through.
[III.] So I incorporated the third lesson. I decided that
I would start the congregation reading the whole Bible...and
my sermon would come out of the chapters that they had read.
I have been following this practice now for many years and
have seen people in the church, for the first time in their
lives, read the Bible all the way through.
These two transitions--from topical messages to expository
teaching, and to working straight through the Bible--have
taught me some very fascinating things. Number one, I came
to the realization that during the years of my topical ministry
I did not have a true biblical emphasis in my preaching. Though
I preached every sermon from the Scriptures, my preaching
was not biblically balanced. The Scriptures tell of God's
part and of man's part in salvation. The majority of the topical
sermons that I preached were emphasizing man's responsibility.
My sermons exhorted the people to pray, to witness, to commit
their lives to serving the Lord.
But when you get into a book of the Bible and continue straight
through, you find there is a greater emphasis on what God
has done for man than what man should be doing for God. In
a sense, through the topical sermons, I was emphasizing what
we should be doing for God in order that God might respond
to us. I was making man the initiator and God the respondent.
For instance, if you give, God will give back to you, measured
out, pressed down, running over. If you praise, you will be
blessed with a sense of His presence, for He inhabits the
praises of His people. If you will win souls, you will be
wise and shine as the stars forever.
But now I learned that God is always the initiator so His
part is always first. Take the book of Ephesians as an
example. Paul spends the first three chapters of the epistle
telling the church what God had done for them. He prefaces
this section with these words: "Blessed be the God and Father
of our Lord Jesus Christ, who has blessed us with every spiritual
blessing in the heavenly places in Christ." And then his lists
the glorious spiritual blessings and benefits that we have
from God. It is not until he gets to chapter four that he
deals with human responsibility buy exhorting the people to
walk worthy of this calling wherewith they were called.
God was the initiator and now Paul exhorted man to respond
to God. I found that when people began to discover who God
is and all that God has done, they were eager to respond to
God and did not have to be pushed or exhorted to pray or to
serve. Now they were volunteering their services and their
time. They could not do enough for the Lord as they came to
the recognition of what He had done for them.
[IV]. The second thing I learned from these lessons was
that evangelism is the natural by-product of a healthy church.
When, in the early years of my ministry, I placed an emphasis
constantly on the people going out and winning someone to
Jesus Christ, the numbers that were coming to the Lord were
very small. When I began to feed the Body of Christ with
the Word of God, we had more conversions and baptisms in the
first year than we had had in any previous year of our ministry.
And as people continued to grow, the numbers the next year
doubled, and it just continued to go that way because the
people now were strong and spiritually healthy.
[V.] Then we happened on the third interesting change to come
out of these experiences. Christmas and Easter Sundays were
bedlam. There were always so many people coming to Sunday
school and to church that the facilities couldn't hold them.
Thus, those who would come only once or twice a year would
come during the most trying circumstances, which didn't really
encourage them to come back on a regular basis.
To deal with the problem of overcrowded rooms and the confusion
in general, we decided that on Christmas and Easter we would
not have Sunday school followed by church, but would have
Sunday school for the children and Sunday morning service
for the adults simultaneously. We had found in the past that
many people would come to Sunday school and leave before the
church and thus never hear the Gospel. So by bringing the
adults together for teaching they had greater opportunity
to receive the Gospel message.
Everyone loved it so much we continued the practice year-round.
We also discovered that with the children being taught on
their own grade levels and not being present in the sanctuary
during the service heightened the attention level of the adults
considerably. They were able to understand and absorb much
more without the distractions of their children around them.
As the morning service and Sunday school ran concurrently,
I became, in a sense, the teacher of the adult class that
happened to be held in the main sanctuary. [VI.] Later on
we slipped naturally into the fourth lesson: double services.
This worked out even better because then those who were teaching
Sunday school could attend the next service, and it provided
us with a lot more volunteers for the Sunday school program.
In going to double services we found that a smaller auditorium
and smaller facilities were able to accommodate twice the
number of people. So when we were in our building program
we deliberately built the auditorium and facility with the
intention of having double services. We found that there were
those who loved coming earlier, there were those who loved
coming later, and we were able to enlarge the total membership
without enlarging the facilities or the staff. As an added
benefit we now had two congregations supporting one facility.
This meant that one of the congregations could support our
local program and the surplus funds could be diverted into
mission ventures. When we were later built to triple services,
it was even more exciting, for we were able then to give two-thirds
of our budget to missions while using only one-third of the
total funds for our own local needs. This pattern continues
to the present day.
[VII.] And, then, I learned a fifth lesson for building a
strong church. We were experiencing such growth and so many
new converts that we soon caught the attention of superiors.
When a large church in our district had an opening, I was
asked to take it. While in that church, a group became interested
in the work of the Holy Spirit. They invited me to come and
begin a Bible study in their homes, for they declared that
they knew very little of the Bible apart from the readings
in their prayer book. That Bible study soon grew so large
that we had to break it into two.
The importance of having home Bible studies was invaluable
lesson. In these home Bible studies I developed a whole new
style of teaching. Rather than the Sunday oratory style, I
would just sit and talk in a very natural way. They would
feel the freedom to interrupt when they did not understand
a particular passage or interpretation of the passage, and
it would turn into animated discussions. I found that their
attention span was increased. In church after thirty minutes
of preaching people were restless. [amen to that one! In a
Calvary service I hardly notice the time going by, even if
it's an hour. But in my own fellowship, at times I find myself
clock-watching, hoping for the end of the sermon, drawing
submarines or B-17's in the margins of my notebook.] But we
could sit for an hour-and-a-half to two hours in the home
and then the people would actually be disappointed that I
stopped.
Later on when we started Calvary Chapel, we started several
home Bible studies. The one on Monday night was geared for
the young people and I would more or less "rap" with them
as we sat in the living room of a home in Costa Mesa. The
group soon became so large that we no longer fit in the home.
Kids were sitting in the dining room, kitchen, up the stairway,
in the entry hall, and there would be more outside who couldn't
get in. We were, at that time, building our first chapel.
The slab had been poured, so at night we would set up lights
and the kids would sit on the slab and I would sit there with
them. We just built the chapel walls up around them as time
went on. It was during this time that we began to reach hundreds
of the young people who had been involved in the hippie culture.
They loved the informality of sitting outside and having the
teacher just sit there and talk with them rather than preach
at them.
From these informal talks I developed the style of teaching
in a natural, almost conversational way. I just talk with
the congregation about the things of God, of the glories of
His nature, of His Kingdom. I found that if I'm talking--rather
than preaching--the attention span holds for an hour as they
sit with open Bibles learning God's Word. A half-hour of preaching
can wear people out, but an hour of teaching, if it's done
in an easy conversational way, does not.
These are not complicated lessons. In fact, the secret
that I seek to impart to those eager to enter the ministry
is to teach the Word of God simply. Tradition can be a hard
thing to overcome, but lack of church growth can be more discouraging.
It's been exciting to watch Calvary Chapels all across
the country grow as the power of God touches people's lives.
The harvest of souls into the Kingdom of God is our goal.
May God ever receive the glory and honor due His name.
[VIII.] Another important principle that pastors learn
at Calvary Chapel is complete dependence on the Holy Spirit
to help them in expounding the Word. Jesus said that the Holy
Spirit would teach them all things and bring to their remembrance
the things that they had been taught [John 14]. Paul said
that the natural man could not understand the things of the
Spirit neither could he know them for they were spiritually
discerned [1 Cor. 2]. What is found at Calvary Chapel is the
Spirit of God working through the Word of God to change the
people of God.
There are many churches that offer excellent teaching of the
Bible, but almost deny the current work of the Spirit of God.
This creates dead orthodoxy. The people may be well versed
in the Scriptures but it has not altered their lifestyles
to any great extent. They have a form of godliness but have
denied the power.
On the other side of the coin are churches that emphasize
the Holy Spirit but neglect teaching from the Word. This leads
to emotionalism and an unstable condition that is open to
every wind of doctrine and cunning craftiness of men who are
standing ready to deceive. Many heretical teachers have found
fertile soil in church congregations that overemphasize only
emotional experiences. It is so important to have a balance
of the Word and the Spirit so that you can see the life-changing
power of God at work and a stable growth of the Body of Christ.
At Calvary Chapel we have confidence that when God guides,
God provides, so there is never an emphasis on money or giving.
Many of our churches do not even pass the plate, but
place a box at the entrance where the people who desire may
contribute. God is never represented as being broke or facing
imminent bankruptcy. The pastors have been taught that God
is perfectly capable of supplying the needs for the things
He desires to see accomplished. God does not need the support
of His people to stay in business, the people need the support
of God.
It is sad to see people driven away from the church by the
appeals and gimmicks that have been used to solicit funds.
Some have dropped out of church because they have nothing
to give and felt embarrassed. We do not let this happen to
them at Calvary Chapel because they are never asked to give
or to pledge. As the apostle Paul said, never let your giving
be by pressure or constraint, but let every man give as he
has purposed in his own heart, for God loves a cheerful giver.
If you asked people who visited Calvary Chapel what impressed
them the most, you would probably hear a variety of things,
but some of the words that you would hear most often would
be warm, loving, worshipful, casual. The first impression
as you walk into the service is the warmth of God's love among
His people. You see a lot of hugging, which probably goes
back to the days of the hippies. There is a lot of happiness
and laughter. There is also a reverent but casual atmosphere,
which is reflected in the styles of clothes the people wear.
They do not feel that they need to get dressed up to attend
church. Yet if they are dressed up they do not feel uncomfortable.
There is an acceptance of the person not the style of clothing.
This again goes back to the hippie days when all kinds of
clothes and styles were worn. Chuck Girard who was singing
with the Love Song group in the earlier days of Calvary expressed
it very well in his song "Little Country Church" with the
lines:
"Long
hair, short hair,
Some coats and ties,
People finally coming around,
Looking past the hair
Straight into the eyes."
The music at Calvary Chapel is fresh and
alive, and filled with worship choruses. Many times a worship
group will lead the singing accompanied by guitars, drums,
and keyboards. Many of the choruses are composed by the leaders
in the worship groups and are passed on to the other Calvary
Chapels. This gives quite a contemporary feel. Often a young
person will share a song and explain that the Lord just gave
him the song that afternoon.
Most of the churches in the U.S. today are highly organized
and highly structured. By this I mean they stress the dependence
that the church has on the people and the dependence the people
have on the church. At Calvary Chapel we prefer a looser structure,
as we stress our total dependency on God. It is interesting
that most of the people in the U.S. today fit more comfortably
into an independent, casual category, thus we fish almost
alone in a huge, well-stocked pond, while many other churches
try to fish in a much smaller pond.
In the book of Acts we are told that when the Church was born
the believers continued steadfastly in the apostles' doctrine,
fellowship, breaking of bread, and prayers. These are the
four features that marked the early Church and these are the
features that mark Calvary Chapels. These are the things that
are emphasized, sought after, and practiced, and we have discovered
that--as in the early Church--the Lord adds to our numbers
daily.
After seeing this work of the Lord with its remarkable fruit
one is left with an obvious conclusion: "To God be the glory,
great things He has done."
To
quote a famous 1960s tune, The times, they are
a changin. After September 11, 2001 we have all become
aware of the fact that the world has become a more dangerous
place to live in, even within the borders of the United States.
September 11th should be a wake-up call for all Christians
and those who think they are Christians. If you were to die
today-tonight-would you be assured of your place in Gods
heavenly kingdom, a recipient of eternal life? The words of
the apostle Paul ring out across the centuries asking this
age-old question Examine yourselves, whether ye be in
the faith; prove your own selves. Know ye not your own selves,
how that Jesus Christ is in you, except ye be reprobates.
Dr. Charles F. Stanley poses this same eternal question in
his sermon What Does It Mean To Believe In Jesus.
And he gives three essential criteria that will help you answer
that question in your own personal life. The assurance of
your eternity is worth confirming. CLICK
HERE to find out if Jesus Christ is in
you.
| |
 |
|